AMD Sempron 3600+ vs AMD Sempron 3100+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3600+ and AMD Sempron 3100+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3600+
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 364 vs 298
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2006 vs April 2005 |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 364 vs 298 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3100+
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 383 vs 377
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 383 vs 377 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3600+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3100+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Sempron 3600+ | AMD Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 377 | 383 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 364 | 298 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Sempron 3600+ | AMD Sempron 3100+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Manila | Palermo |
| Launch date | May 2006 | April 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | $60 |
| Place in performance rating | 3180 | 3181 |
| Price now | $12 | $60 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.93 | 2.22 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 103 mm | 84 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 81 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2 | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 62 Watt |
