AMD Turion II N570 vs AMD Turion II Neo K685
Comparative analysis of AMD Turion II N570 and AMD Turion II Neo K685 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II N570
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Around 4% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 265 KB vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Neo K685
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Turion II N570
CPU 2: AMD Turion II Neo K685
Name | AMD Turion II N570 | AMD Turion II Neo K685 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 729 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 684 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Turion II N570 | AMD Turion II Neo K685 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Champlain | Geneva |
Launch date | 16 December 2010 | 15 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2666 |
Series | AMD Turion II | AMD Turion II Neo |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
L1 cache | 265 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | S1 | S1g4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |