AMD Turion X2 RM-75 vs AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+

Comparative analysis of AMD Turion X2 RM-75 and AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 RM-75

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• Around 32% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.67 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 770 vs 559
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 708 vs 364

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Turion X2 RM-75
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP-M 2200+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	770 559
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	708 364

Compare specifications (specs)