Intel Atom N2800 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom N2800 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N2800
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 13.6x lower typical power consumption: 6.5 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 590 vs 320
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1216 vs 1006
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 December 2011 vs August 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6.5 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 590 vs 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1216 vs 1006 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 2.33 GHz vs 1.86 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 993 vs 319
- 4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1782 vs 444
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz vs 1.86 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 993 vs 319 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1782 vs 444 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom N2800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Atom N2800 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 319 | 993 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 444 | 1782 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 590 | 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1216 | 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Atom N2800 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Cedarview | Yorkfield |
Launch date | 28 December 2011 | August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $47 | |
Place in performance rating | 2990 | 3129 |
Processor Number | N2800 | Q8200 |
Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
Price now | $22.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 36.05 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 66 mm | 164 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 176 million | 456 million |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Maximum memory size | 4.88 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 640 MHz | |
Processor graphics | Integrated | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FCBGA559 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 95 Watt |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |