Intel Atom x7-Z8750 vs Intel Pentium 2020M
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x7-Z8750 and Intel Pentium 2020M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x7-Z8750
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.56 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Launch date | 1 April 2016 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.56 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 2020M
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1268 vs 679
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1380 vs 1289
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 426 vs 226
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 796 vs 766
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2189 vs 1682
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2189 vs 1682
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1268 vs 679 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1380 vs 1289 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 426 vs 226 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 796 vs 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2189 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2189 vs 1682 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x7-Z8750
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 2020M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x7-Z8750 | Intel Pentium 2020M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 679 | 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1289 | 1380 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 226 | 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 766 | 796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 635 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1063 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1682 | 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 635 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1063 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1682 | 2189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x7-Z8750 | Intel Pentium 2020M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 April 2016 | 1 October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $37 | $134 |
| Place in performance rating | 2469 | 2473 |
| Processor Number | x7-Z8750 | 2020M |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $134 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.01 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.56 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 118 mm | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 16 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 600 MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics 405 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| SDVO | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600 | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA1380 | FCPGA988 |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 2 | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | 3 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x7-Z8750 with others
IntelAtom x7-Z8750 vs
IntelPentium 2020M
IntelAtom x7-Z8750 vs
IntelCore i5-3380M
IntelAtom x7-Z8750 vs
IntelCore i5-4210H
IntelAtom x7-Z8750 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelAtom x7-Z8750 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelAtom x7-Z8750 vs
AMDA4-9120e
