Intel Celeron 445 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 445 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 445
- CPU is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
Launch date | May 2008 vs April 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 60% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 1.87 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 1.87 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 445
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Name | Intel Celeron 445 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 746 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 653 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron 445 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Conroe-CL | Brisbane |
Launch date | May 2008 | April 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2641 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $24.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.01 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 76 mm | 126 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.87 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
Transistor count | 105 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 771 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |