Intel Celeron E1500 vs Intel Celeron 2.20
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron E1500 and Intel Celeron 2.20 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E1500
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 73.3°C vs 70°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 764 vs 537
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 626 vs 213
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | November 2008 vs November 2002 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C vs 70°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 8 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (shared) vs 128 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 764 vs 537 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 626 vs 213 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 2.20
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 57.1 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57.1 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron E1500
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2.20
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron E1500 | Intel Celeron 2.20 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 764 | 537 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 626 | 213 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 260 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron E1500 | Intel Celeron 2.20 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Conroe | Northwood |
Launch date | November 2008 | November 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $63 | |
Place in performance rating | 2940 | 2946 |
Price now | $19.65 | |
Processor Number | E1500 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.57 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.20 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 400 MHz FSB |
Die size | 77 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 8 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (shared) | 128 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C | 70°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 105 million | 55 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | 1.315V-1.525V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | PPGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 57.1 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |