Intel Celeron G1101 vs AMD Phenom II X4 900e
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1101 and AMD Phenom II X4 900e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1101
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 929 vs 917
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | January 2010 vs June 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 929 vs 917 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 900e
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.27 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 73 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1505 vs 1086
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.27 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 73 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1505 vs 1086 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1101
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 900e
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron G1101 | AMD Phenom II X4 900e |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 929 | 917 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1086 | 1505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron G1101 | AMD Phenom II X4 900e | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Clarkdale | Deneb |
Launch date | January 2010 | June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | |
Place in performance rating | 2378 | 2380 |
Price now | $14.09 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.84 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 81 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.27 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 382 million | 758 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 1156 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 73 Watt | 65 Watt |