Intel Celeron N2920 vs Intel Core i3-2350M
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2920 and Intel Core i3-2350M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2920
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 24% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.86 vs 0.689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 December 2013 vs 15 May 2011 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| L1 cache | 224 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.86 vs 0.689 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-2350M
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 2.00 GHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 974 vs 552
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1258 vs 950
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.442 vs 1.016
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.392 vs 7.868
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.177 vs 0.1
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.665 vs 1.508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 2.00 GHz |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 974 vs 552 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1258 vs 950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.442 vs 1.016 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.392 vs 7.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.177 vs 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.665 vs 1.508 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2920
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2350M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N2920 | Intel Core i3-2350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 552 | 974 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 950 | 1258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.016 | 1.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.868 | 26.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | 0.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.508 | 1.665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.86 | 0.689 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 386 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 848 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N2920 | Intel Core i3-2350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 December 2013 | 15 May 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $225 |
| Place in performance rating | 2996 | 2999 |
| Processor Number | N2920 | i3-2350M |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $41.97 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.37 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.86 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA) |
| Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 149 mm | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | |
| Transistor count | 624 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1066 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 844 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| SDVO | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023) |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron N2920 with others
IntelCeleron N2920 vs
IntelCore i3-2350M
IntelCeleron N2920 vs
IntelAtom N2600
IntelCeleron N2920 vs
IntelPentium N3540
