Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Core i7-820QM
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N3050 and Intel Core i7-820QM processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3050
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 45 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.435 vs 0.267
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 vs 23 September 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 45 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 vs 0.267 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-820QM
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 42% higher clock speed: 3.06 GHz vs 2.16 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1041 vs 555
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1810 vs 591
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 381 vs 186
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1185 vs 339
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.276 vs 1.169
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.687 vs 4.85
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz vs 2.16 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1041 vs 555 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1810 vs 591 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 vs 186 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1185 vs 339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.276 vs 1.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.687 vs 4.85 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3050
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-820QM
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N3050 | Intel Core i7-820QM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 555 | 1041 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 591 | 1810 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 186 | 381 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 | 1185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.169 | 4.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.85 | 20.687 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.435 | 0.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.25 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 515 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1428 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 515 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1428 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N3050 | Intel Core i7-820QM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Braswell | Clarksfield |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 | 23 September 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $546 |
| Place in performance rating | 2670 | 2827 |
| Price now | $119.42 | $139 |
| Processor Number | N3050 | i7-820QM |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.17 | 6.84 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L3 cache | 8196 KB | |
| Transistor count | 774 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 45 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | 1x16, 2x8 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron N3050 with others
IntelCeleron N3050 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T5270
IntelCeleron N3050 vs
IntelCore i3-3217UE
IntelCeleron N3050 vs
IntelCore i3-2348M
