Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E4600
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 928 vs 617
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | October 2007 vs November 2006 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 928 vs 617 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 972 vs 875
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 972 vs 875 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E4600
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 928 | 617 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 875 | 972 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 279 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 491 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 | AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Conroe | Windsor |
| Launch date | October 2007 | November 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 2815 | 2817 |
| Price now | $157.95 | $499.50 |
| Processor Number | E4600 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.58 | 0.88 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 111 mm2 | 235 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 167 million | 227 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | F |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||