Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and AMD Athlon 64 3500+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 24x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1463 vs 954
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | November 2007 vs January 2001 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 12288 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1463 vs 954 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3500+
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 67 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1008 vs 465
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 67 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1008 vs 465 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 | AMD Athlon 64 3500+ |
---|---|---|
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 465 | 1008 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1463 | 954 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4864 | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 620 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 539 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 | AMD Athlon 64 3500+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | San Diego |
Launch date | November 2007 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 2297 | 2540 |
Processor Number | QX9650 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Price now | $108.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.46 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 214 mm2 | 115 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 12288 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 64.5°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 820 million | 105 million |
Unlocked | ||
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 67 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |