Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 vs Intel Core Duo T2600
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Intel Core Duo T2600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.16 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1085 vs 667
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1104 vs 460
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2007 vs 5 January 2006 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.16 GHz |
L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2048 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 vs 667 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1104 vs 460 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo T2600
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 44 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 44 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
CPU 2: Intel Core Duo T2600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 | Intel Core Duo T2600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | 667 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1104 | 460 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1485 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.342 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.436 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 | Intel Core Duo T2600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Merom | Yonah |
Launch date | 1 September 2007 | 5 January 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | $440 |
Place in performance rating | 2740 | 2757 |
Processor Number | X7900 | T2600 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
Die size | 143 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 2048 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 291 million | 151 million |
VID voltage range | 1.100V-1.375V | 1.1625V - 1.30V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR1 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PPGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt | 31 Watt |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |