Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 881 vs 451
- 9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1575 vs 175
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 vs April 2002 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 130 nm |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 881 vs 451 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1575 vs 175 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 881 | 451 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1575 | 175 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 301 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.387 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 | Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Northwood |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 | April 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $348 | |
Place in performance rating | 3079 | 3084 |
Price now | $389 | |
Processor Number | Q9000 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.91 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 400 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
L2 cache | 6134 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Transistor count | 410 million | 55 million |
VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.175V | 1.3V |
L1 cache | 8 KB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 30 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 |