Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 and AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1139 vs 749
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2150 vs 674
- 37.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 vs 0.708
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | August 2008 vs October 2007 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1139 vs 749 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2150 vs 674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 vs 0.708 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.084 vs 0.574
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.084 vs 0.574 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1139 | 749 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2150 | 674 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 | 1.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 | 0.708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Brisbane |
| Launch date | August 2008 | October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3130 | 3141 |
| Price now | $33.98 | |
| Processor Number | Q9400 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.99 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | 126 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 456 million | 154 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||