Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1213 vs 788
- 3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2240 vs 737
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 395 vs 255
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1225 vs 440
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1213 vs 788 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2240 vs 737 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 395 vs 255 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1225 vs 440 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 | Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1213 | 788 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2240 | 737 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 395 | 255 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1225 | 440 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.762 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500 | Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Conroe |
| Place in performance rating | 2941 | 2936 |
| Processor Number | Q9500 | E4400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch date | July 2007 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | 111 mm2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | L2=61.4°C, M0=73.3°C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 456 million | 167 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.5V |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
