Intel Core i3-10105F vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-10105F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-10105F

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher clock speed: 4.40 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
• Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95°C
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2656 vs 2245

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2600

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm FinFET vs 14 nm
• 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 2.7x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13198 vs 8994
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 3464 vs 3270

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core i3-10105F
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2600

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2656 2245
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	8994 13198
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2	3270 3464

Compare specifications (specs)