Intel Core i3-7120T vs Intel Core i3-7340

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-7120T and Intel Core i3-7340 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-7120T

  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 51 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 51 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-7340

  • Around 17% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
  • Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency 4.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
L3 cache 4096 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared)

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core i3-7120T Intel Core i3-7340

Essentials

Architecture codename Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Launch date July 2017 July 2017
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 3072 KB (shared) 4096 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 65 °C 65 °C
Maximum frequency 3.6 GHz 4.2 GHz
Number of cores 2 2

Memory

Supported memory types DDR4 DDR4

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 1151 1151
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 51 Watt

Advanced Technologies

Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Core i3-7120T with others

Intel Core i3-7120T Intel
Core i3-7120T
vs Intel Xeon Bronze 3106 Intel
Xeon Bronze 3106
Intel Core i3-7120T Intel
Core i3-7120T
vs Intel Core i3-7340 Intel
Core i3-7340
Intel Core i3-7120T Intel
Core i3-7120T
vs Intel Core i3-7320T Intel
Core i3-7320T