Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Celeron 2970M

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-N300 and Intel Celeron 2970M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-N300

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
• 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
• Around 68% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
• Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm vs 22 nm
• 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 37 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1867 vs 1245
• 5.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 7604 vs 1501

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 2970M

• 262144x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 349525.3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core i3-N300
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2970M

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1867 1245
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	7604 1501

Compare specifications (specs)