Intel Core i5-3380M vs Intel Core i7-3687U
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-3380M and Intel Core i7-3687U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3380M
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 3.30 GHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1774 vs 1600
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2916 vs 2649
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 621 vs 571
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1362 vs 1207
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6.857 vs 3.896
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.471 vs 0.967
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2568 vs 2517
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2568 vs 2517
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 3.30 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1774 vs 1600 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2916 vs 2649 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 621 vs 571 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1362 vs 1207 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.857 vs 3.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.471 vs 0.967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2568 vs 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2568 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-3687U
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.2 vs 0.544
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.194 vs 0.074
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.42 vs 0.608
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB vs 3 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.2 vs 0.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.194 vs 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.42 vs 0.608 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-3380M
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-3687U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-3380M | Intel Core i7-3687U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1774 | 1600 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2916 | 2649 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 621 | 571 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1362 | 1207 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.544 | 4.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.857 | 3.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 | 0.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.471 | 0.967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.608 | 1.42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2568 | 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2568 | 2517 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-3380M | Intel Core i7-3687U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 January 2013 | 1 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 2473 | 2486 |
| Processor Number | i5-3380M | i7-3687U |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 118 mm | 118 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x166 | 0x166 |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.25 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.25 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5 x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31.0 x 24.0mm (BGA1023) | 31.0 x 24.0mm (BGA1023) |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988, FCBGA1023 | FCBGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-3380M with others
IntelCore i5-3380M vs
IntelPentium 2020M
IntelCore i5-3380M vs
IntelCore i7-3687U
IntelCore i5-3380M vs
IntelCeleron 1019Y
IntelCore i5-3380M vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCore i5-3380M vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCore i5-3380M vs
AMDA4-9120e
