Intel Core i5-4200U vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-4200U and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4200U
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher clock speed: 2.60 GHz vs 1.87 GHz
- Around 63% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 61.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1290 vs 695
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2184 vs 652
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 540 vs 251
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1121 vs 446
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 June 2013 vs July 2006 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.60 GHz vs 1.87 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 61.4°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1290 vs 695 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2184 vs 652 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 540 vs 251 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1121 vs 446 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4200U
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4200U | Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1290 | 695 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2184 | 652 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 540 | 251 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1121 | 446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.575 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.302 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.229 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.291 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.822 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3936 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-4200U | Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Conroe |
| Launch date | 4 June 2013 | July 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 1935 | 3022 |
| Processor Number | i5-4200U | E6300 |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Price now | $12.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.13 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 118 mm | 111 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 61.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.60 GHz | 1.87 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 167 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0xA16 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3280x2000@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1168 | PLGA775, LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCI support | ||
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 4 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-4200U with others
IntelCore i5-4200U vs
IntelXeon E5-2658
IntelCore i5-4200U vs
IntelPentium Gold 4410Y
IntelCore i5-4200U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore i5-4200U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i5-4200U vs
AMDR-272F
IntelCore i5-4200U vs
IntelCeleron 4305U
