Intel Core i5-4300M vs AMD A4-5000
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-4300M and AMD A4-5000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4300M
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1735 vs 504
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2982 vs 1285
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 683 vs 175
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1476 vs 580
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.633 vs 2.119
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.695 vs 5.104
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.316 vs 0.111
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.529 vs 0.24
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.234 vs 1.373
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1081 vs 479
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3248 vs 1133
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4709 vs 2123
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1081 vs 479
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3248 vs 1133
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4709 vs 2123
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1735 vs 504 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2982 vs 1285 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 683 vs 175 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1476 vs 580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.633 vs 2.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.695 vs 5.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.316 vs 0.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.529 vs 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.234 vs 1.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1081 vs 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3248 vs 1133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4709 vs 2123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1081 vs 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3248 vs 1133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4709 vs 2123 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-5000
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 37 Watt
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 37 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4300M
CPU 2: AMD A4-5000
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4300M | AMD A4-5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1735 | 504 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2982 | 1285 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 683 | 175 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1476 | 580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.633 | 2.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.695 | 5.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.316 | 0.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.529 | 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.234 | 1.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1081 | 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3248 | 1133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4709 | 2123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1081 | 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3248 | 1133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4709 | 2123 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-4300M | AMD A4-5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Kabini |
| Launch date | 4 June 2013 | 23 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $227 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1585 | 2823 |
| Processor Number | i5-4300M | |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Laptop, Tablet |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AM5000IBJ44HMD | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Die size | 130 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz | |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 960 Million | 1178 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600 | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x416 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.25 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.25 GHz | 500 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | AMD Radeon HD 8330 |
| Enduro | ||
| iGPU core count | 128 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 4.7mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA946 | FT3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-4300M with others
IntelCore i5-4300M vs
IntelXeon E3-1505L v5
IntelCore i5-4300M vs
AMDRX-427BB
IntelCore i5-4300M vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
IntelCore i5-4300M vs
IntelCore i5-10210Y
IntelCore i5-4300M vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
IntelCore i5-4300M vs
IntelCeleron G6900TE
