Intel Core i5-540M vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-540M and Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-540M
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 92% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.467 vs 0.175
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.338 vs 12.489
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.677 vs 0.36
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.984 vs 1.164
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 January 2010 vs 1 April 2009 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.467 vs 0.175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.338 vs 12.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.677 vs 0.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.984 vs 1.164 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1133 vs 432
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1725 vs 922
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 3 MB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1133 vs 432 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1725 vs 922 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-540M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i5-540M | Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1153 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1802 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 432 | 1133 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 922 | 1725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.467 | 0.175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.338 | 12.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.677 | 0.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.984 | 1.164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i5-540M | Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Arrandale | Penryn |
Launch date | 4 January 2010 | 1 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $257 | $289 |
Place in performance rating | 3047 | 3048 |
Price now | $189.95 | |
Processor Number | i5-540M | SU9600 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.80 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.53 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 81 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 382 million | 410 million |
VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 500 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 766 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 766 MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm | 22mm x 22mm |
Sockets supported | BGA1288, PGA988 | BGA956 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1x16 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |