Intel Core i7-14700F vs Intel Core i9-14900K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Core i9-14900K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-14700F
- 873813.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 961194.7x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 2MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) vs 36MB (shared) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-14900K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 20
- 4 more threads: 32 vs 28
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz
- Around 20% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4760 vs 4342
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 60899 vs 44846
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 24 vs 20 |
Number of threads | 32 vs 28 |
Maximum frequency | 6 GHz vs 5.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) vs 80 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 4760 vs 4342 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 60899 vs 44846 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-14700F
CPU 2: Intel Core i9-14900K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i7-14700F | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 4342 | 4760 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 44846 | 60899 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 16871 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i7-14700F | Intel Core i9-14900K | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
Place in performance rating | 51 | 40 |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Die size | 257 mm² | 257 mm² |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) | 36MB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 5.4 GHz | 6 GHz |
Number of cores | 20 | 24 |
Number of threads | 28 | 32 |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5, Dual-channel |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 1700 | 1700 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 16 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes, (CPU only) |