Intel Core i7-14700K vs Intel Core i7-10700
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-14700K and Intel Core i7-10700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-14700K
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 20 vs 8
- 12 more threads: 28 vs 16
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 5.6 GHz vs 4.80 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.1x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 20x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4477 vs 2902
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 53204 vs 16362
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 14690 vs 6896
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 vs 27 May 2020 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 20 vs 8 |
Number of threads | 28 vs 16 |
Maximum frequency | 5.6 GHz vs 4.80 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) vs 16 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 4477 vs 2902 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 53204 vs 16362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 14690 vs 6896 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-10700
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-14700K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i7-14700K | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 4477 | 2902 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 53204 | 16362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 14690 | 6896 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2034 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2034 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11748 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11748 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i7-14700K | Intel Core i7-10700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 17 Oct 2023 | 27 May 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $409 | $323 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | 79 |
Architecture codename | Comet Lake | |
Processor Number | i7-10700 | |
Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors | |
Status | Launched | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
Die size | 257 mm² | |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 5.6 GHz | 4.80 GHz |
Number of cores | 20 | 8 |
Number of threads | 28 | 16 |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4-2933 |
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 1700 | LGA 1200 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C | |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 16 Lanes, (CPU only) | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0x9BC5 | |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 64 GB | |
Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
4K resolution support | ||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |