Intel Core i9-14900HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-14900HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-14900HX
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 12
- 8 more threads: 32 vs 24
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 5.8 GHz vs 5.2 GHz
- 2.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4194304x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 589824x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4294 vs 3945
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 4 Jan 2023 |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 12 |
| Number of threads | 32 vs 24 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.8 GHz vs 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) vs 64MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4294 vs 3945 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 45430 vs 45328 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-14900HX
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i9-14900HX | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4294 | 3945 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 45430 | 45328 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 11242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i9-14900HX | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 4 Jan 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 73 | 137 |
| Architecture codename | Zen 4 | |
| Family | Dragon Range | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Die size | 257 mm² | 2x 71 mm² |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72°C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 5.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 12 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 24 |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5-5200 MHz, Dual-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | Intel BGA 1964 | FL1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 16 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) |