Intel Itanium 9720 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Itanium 9720 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Itanium 9720
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 130 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Itanium 9720
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W)
| Name | Intel Itanium 9720 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 330 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1019 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.255 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.748 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.829 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Itanium 9720 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (105W) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Kittson | Kentsfield |
| Launch date | Q2'17 | January 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 3288 |
| Processor Number | 9720 | Q6600 |
| Series | Intel® Itanium® Processor 9700 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Server | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 1.73 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 6.4 GT/s QPI | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95.0 C | B3=62.2°C; G0=71°C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 286 mm2 | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
| Transistor count | 582 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.500V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | LGA1248 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |