Intel N100 vs AMD FX-8300

Comparative analysis of Intel N100 and AMD FX-8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel N100

• CPU is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 70.50°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 15.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 95 Watt
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1912 vs 1488
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5408 vs 5337

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8300

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 24% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel N100
CPU 2: AMD FX-8300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1912 1488
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	5408 5337

Compare specifications (specs)