Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.16 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 743 vs 737
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 447 vs 422
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2008 vs 28 July 2006 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 743 vs 737 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 251 vs 250 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 447 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 34 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 735 vs 667
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 34 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 735 vs 667 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 743 | 737 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 667 | 735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 251 | 250 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 447 | 422 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Merom | Merom |
| Launch date | 1 October 2008 | 28 July 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 2979 | 2982 |
| Processor Number | T3400 | T7200 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $286 | |
| Price now | $99.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.44 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.16 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 667 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.16 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 291 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.175V | 1.0375V-1.300V |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | PPGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 34 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
