Intel Pentium Gold G5400 vs AMD A8-5500
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Gold G5400 and AMD A8-5500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 58 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2189 vs 1333
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3734 vs 2610
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 912 vs 455
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2007 vs 1243
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 42.899 vs 8.685
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.305 vs 0.185
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.337 vs 0.504
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.324 vs 3.038
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1108 vs 789
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1108 vs 789
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | January 2018 vs October 2012 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2189 vs 1333 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3734 vs 2610 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 912 vs 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2007 vs 1243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.899 vs 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.305 vs 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.337 vs 0.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.324 vs 3.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1108 vs 789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1108 vs 789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-5500
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.063 vs 1.695
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2225 vs 1809
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4729 vs 3401
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2225 vs 1809
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4729 vs 3401
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.063 vs 1.695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 vs 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4729 vs 3401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 vs 1809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4729 vs 3401 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Gold G5400
CPU 2: AMD A8-5500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | AMD A8-5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2189 | 1333 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3734 | 2610 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 912 | 455 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2007 | 1243 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.695 | 4.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.899 | 8.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.305 | 0.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.337 | 0.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.324 | 3.038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1108 | 789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | 2225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3401 | 4729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1108 | 789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | 2225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3401 | 4729 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | AMD A8-5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Trinity |
| Launch date | January 2018 | October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1978 | 1957 |
| Price now | $127.90 | |
| Processor Number | G5400 | |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Gold Processor Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.06 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.70 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E90/x93 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium Gold G5400 with others
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
AMDAthlon X2 7550
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 B57
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
IntelCore i5-3550S
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
IntelCore i3-4150T
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
IntelCore i3-6320
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1600 AF
