Intel Pentium J2900 vs AMD Phenom II X4 925
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium J2900 and AMD Phenom II X4 925 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium J2900
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 42.287 vs 10.457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs May 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.287 vs 10.457 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1150 vs 730
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2277 vs 1246
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.088 vs 0.41
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.231 vs 2.03
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 224 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 vs 730 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2277 vs 1246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.088 vs 0.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.231 vs 2.03 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium J2900
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 925
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium J2900 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 730 | 1150 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1246 | 2277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.41 | 1.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.287 | 10.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.03 | 3.231 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1247 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1247 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1147 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium J2900 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Deneb |
| Launch date | 1 November 2013 | May 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $94 | $160 |
| Place in performance rating | 2966 | 2976 |
| Processor Number | J2900 | |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor J Series | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $43.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.90 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.41 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Die size | 258 mm | |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Transistor count | 758 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 896 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 896 MHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||