Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium 967
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium N4200 and Intel Pentium 967 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium N4200
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 92% higher clock speed: 2.50 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100 °C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 17 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 858 vs 616
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2170 vs 643
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2016 vs 1 October 2011 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.50 GHz vs 1.3 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100 °C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 17 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 858 vs 616 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2170 vs 643 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 967
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1227 vs 317
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1904 vs 975
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1227 vs 317 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1904 vs 975 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium N4200
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 967
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel Pentium 967 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 858 | 616 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2170 | 643 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 317 | 1227 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 975 | 1904 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.711 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.677 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1844 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3147 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 659 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1844 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3147 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel Pentium 967 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 1 September 2016 | 1 October 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2313 | 2318 |
| Price now | $196.49 | |
| Processor Number | N4200 | 967 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.02 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.50 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 131 mm | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | |
| Transistor count | 504 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3 1066/1333 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x5A84 | |
| Execution Units | 18 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | 1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| CRT | ||
| SDVO | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm | 31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1023) |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1296 | BGA1023 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 17 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium N4200 with others
IntelPentium N4200 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SU9300
IntelPentium N4200 vs
IntelPentium 967
IntelPentium N4200 vs
IntelCore i7-4500U
IntelPentium N4200 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelPentium N4200 vs
AMDA4-9120e
