Intel Xeon 5130 vs AMD Opteron 254
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon 5130 and AMD Opteron 254 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 5130
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 92 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 817 vs 578
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1653 vs 451
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | June 2006 vs August 2005 |
| Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 92 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 817 vs 578 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1653 vs 451 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 254
- Around 40% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon 5130
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 254
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon 5130 | AMD Opteron 254 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 817 | 578 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1653 | 451 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1202 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1950 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.436 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.166 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon 5130 | AMD Opteron 254 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Woodcrest | Troy |
| Launch date | June 2006 | August 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $16 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2829 | 2881 |
| Price now | $13.26 | |
| Processor Number | 5130 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.61 | |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 65°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 291 million | 106 million |
| VID voltage range | B2=1.00V-1.50V | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
| Sockets supported | 771 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 92 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||