Intel Xeon E-2468 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E-2468 and Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E-2468
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 5.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- 419430.4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 680157.4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 165 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3956 vs 2862
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 Dec 2023 vs 10 Jan 2023 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 2MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) vs 37.5MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 165 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3956 vs 2862 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
- 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 20 vs 8
- 24 more threads: 40 vs 16
- 2.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 67971 vs 26224
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 20 vs 8 |
| Number of threads | 40 vs 16 |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) vs 80 KB (per core) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 67971 vs 26224 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E-2468
CPU 2: Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon E-2468 | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3956 | 2862 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 26224 | 67971 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon E-2468 | Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 14 Dec 2023 | 10 Jan 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $426 | $1186 |
| Place in performance rating | 182 | 183 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2000 MHz |
| Die size | 257 mm² | |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 37.5MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 5.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 20 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 40 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 82°C | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4000 MHz, Eight-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | 1700 | 4677 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 165 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 16 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) |
