Intel Xeon E5-1620 vs Intel Xeon X5675
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-1620 and Intel Xeon X5675 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-1620
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 3.80 GHz vs 3.46 GHz
- Around 30% higher maximum memory size: 375 GB vs 288 GB
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1755 vs 1512
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 730 vs 588
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | March 2012 vs February 2011 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz vs 3.46 GHz |
| Maximum memory size | 375 GB vs 288 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1755 vs 1512 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 730 vs 588 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X5675
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
- Around 27% higher maximum core temperature: 81.3°C vs 64.0 °C
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 20% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 11633 vs 5850
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3454 vs 3096
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 vs 8 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81.3°C vs 64.0 °C |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) vs 10240 KB (shared) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 11633 vs 5850 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3454 vs 3096 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-1620
CPU 2: Intel Xeon X5675
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon E5-1620 | Intel Xeon X5675 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1755 | 1512 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5850 | 11633 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 730 | 588 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3096 | 3454 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 4712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.995 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 58.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.77 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.068 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 | Intel Xeon X5675 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge EP | Westmere EP |
| Launch date | March 2012 | February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $313 | $162 |
| Place in performance rating | 2112 | 2125 |
| Price now | $329.93 | $79.99 |
| Processor Number | E5-1620 | X5675 |
| Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 Family | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.09 | 30.70 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 0 QPI | 6.4 GT/s QPI |
| Die size | 294 mm | 239 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 10240 KB (shared) | 12288 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 64.0 °C | 81.3°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.80 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
| Transistor count | 1270 million | 1170 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.60V - 1.35V | 0.750V-1.350V |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 375 GB | 288 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 | DDR3 800/1066/1333 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 52.5mm x 45.0 mm | 42.5mm X 45mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA2011 | FCLGA1366 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 40-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
