Intel Xeon Gold 5412U vs Intel Xeon w7-3445
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Gold 5412U and Intel Xeon w7-3445 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 20
- 8 more threads: 48 vs 40
- Around 20% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 1258291.2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 907421.5x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 270 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 52218 vs 48463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 20 |
| Number of threads | 48 vs 40 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 2MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 45 MB vs 52.5MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 270 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 52218 vs 48463 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon w7-3445
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 4.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3172 vs 3074
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 Feb 2023 vs 10 Jan 2023 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3172 vs 3074 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
CPU 2: Intel Xeon w7-3445
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Gold 5412U | Intel Xeon w7-3445 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3074 | 3172 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 52218 | 48463 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Gold 5412U | Intel Xeon w7-3445 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 15 Feb 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1113 | $1989 |
| Place in performance rating | 226 | 227 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 45 MB | 52.5MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 81°C | 72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 20 |
| Number of threads | 48 | 40 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 4x 477 mm² | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 MHz, Eight-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | 4677 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 270 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 112 Lanes, (CPU only) |
