Intel Xeon Gold 5512U vs AMD EPYC 4364P

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Gold 5512U and AMD EPYC 4364P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Gold 5512U

• 20 more cores, run more applications at once: 28 vs 8
• 40 more threads: 56 vs 16
• Around 3% higher maximum core temperature: 98°C vs 95°C
• 4.4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 7x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 64% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 60334 vs 34811

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4364P

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher clock speed: 5.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
• Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 185 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3661 vs 3029

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 4364P

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3029 3661
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	60334 34811

Compare specifications (specs)