Intel Xeon Gold 6418H vs AMD EPYC 9254
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Gold 6418H and AMD EPYC 9254 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Gold 6418H
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 25% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 84526 vs 83170
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 vs 2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 84526 vs 83170 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9254
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 4.15 GHz vs 4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- 2.1x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2937 vs 2901
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.15 GHz vs 4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
| L3 cache | 128MB (shared) vs 60MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2937 vs 2901 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Gold 6418H
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9254
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Gold 6418H | AMD EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2901 | 2937 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 84526 | 83170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Gold 6418H | AMD EPYC 9254 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2065 | $2299 |
| Place in performance rating | 112 | 113 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 60MB | 128MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 81°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz | 4.15 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 24 |
| Number of threads | 48 | 48 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 4x 72 mm² | |
| Transistor count | 26,280 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 MHz, Eight-channel | DDR5-4800 MHz, Twelve-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 200-240 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |