Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 4364P
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Gold 6434 and AMD EPYC 4364P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Gold 6434
- Around 25% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 46362 vs 34811
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 46362 vs 34811 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4364P
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher clock speed: 5.4 GHz vs 4.1 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 42% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 195 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3661 vs 3367
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 vs 10 Jan 2023 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.4 GHz vs 4.1 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) vs 22.5 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 195 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3661 vs 3367 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Gold 6434
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 4364P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 | AMD EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3367 | 3661 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 46362 | 34811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434 | AMD EPYC 4364P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2607 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 195 | 197 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64°C | 61°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 16 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 71 mm² | |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
| Transistor count | 6,570 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | AM5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt | 105 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) |