Intel Xeon Max 9480 vs AMD EPYC 4464P
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Max 9480 and AMD EPYC 4464P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Max 9480
- 44 more cores, run more applications at once: 56 vs 12
- 88 more threads: 112 vs 24
- 5.8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 9.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.5x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 111213 vs 47873
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 56 vs 12 |
| Number of threads | 112 vs 24 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 112.5 MB vs 32 MB (shared) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 111213 vs 47873 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4464P
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher clock speed: 5.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4172 vs 2528
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 vs 10 Jan 2023 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4172 vs 2528 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Max 9480
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 4464P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Max 9480 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2528 | 4172 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 111213 | 47873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Max 9480 | AMD EPYC 4464P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12980 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 77 | 79 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 1900 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm² | 2x 71 mm² |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 112.5 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64°C | 61°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 56 | 12 |
| Number of threads | 112 | 24 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
| Transistor count | 13,140 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | AM5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 105 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) |