Intel Xeon Phi 7210 vs AMD Opteron 154
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Phi 7210 and AMD Opteron 154 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Phi 7210
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 63 more cores, run more applications at once: 64 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 32x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 16x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 7306 vs 457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | June 2016 vs August 2005 |
| Number of cores | 64 vs 1 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7306 vs 457 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 154
- Around 87% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.50 GHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 104 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 534 vs 460
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 1.50 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 104 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 534 vs 460 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Phi 7210
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 154
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Phi 7210 | AMD Opteron 154 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 460 | 534 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7306 | 457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Phi 7210 | AMD Opteron 154 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing | Venus |
| Launch date | June 2016 | August 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 2789 | 2951 |
| Processor Number | 7210 | |
| Series | Intel® Xeon Phi™ x200 Product Family | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.30 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 64 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 8000 million | 106 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.550-1.125V | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 6 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | SVLCLGA3647 | 939 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 104 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 36 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | x16 port (Port 2 and 3) may negotiate down to x8, x4, x2, or x1. x4 port (Port1) may negotiate down to x2, or x1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||