Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 vs AMD EPYC 9684X
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 and AMD EPYC 9684X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3156 vs 2894
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3156 vs 2894 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9684X
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 48 more cores, run more applications at once: 96 vs 48
- 96 more threads: 192 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 60% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 11x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 156834 vs 126838
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 10 Jan 2023 |
Number of cores | 96 vs 48 |
Number of threads | 192 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 80 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 1152 MB (shared) vs 105 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 156834 vs 126838 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9684X
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | AMD EPYC 9684X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3156 | 2894 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 126838 | 156834 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | AMD EPYC 9684X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 13 Jun 2023 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7214 | $14756 |
Place in performance rating | 14 | 6 |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.55 GHz |
Die size | 4x 477 mm² | 12x 72 mm² |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 105 MB | 1152 MB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Number of cores | 48 | 96 |
Number of threads | 96 | 192 |
Unlocked | ||
Transistor count | 135,240 million | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Sockets supported | 4677 | SP5 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |