Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 vs AMD EPYC 9684X
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 and AMD EPYC 9684X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 400 Watt
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9684X
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 48 more cores, run more applications at once: 96 vs 48
- 96 more threads: 192 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 60% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 11x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2897 vs 2735
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 148066 vs 116663
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 10 Jan 2023 |
| Number of cores | 96 vs 48 |
| Number of threads | 192 vs 96 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 80 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1152 MB (shared) vs 105 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2897 vs 2735 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 148066 vs 116663 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9684X
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | AMD EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2735 | 2897 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 116663 | 148066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | AMD EPYC 9684X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 13 Jun 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7214 | $14756 |
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 8 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.55 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm² | 12x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 105 MB | 1152 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 48 | 96 |
| Number of threads | 96 | 192 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Transistor count | 135,240 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |