Intel Xeon W-3375 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W-3375 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W-3375

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 34 more cores, run more applications at once: 38 vs 4
• 72 more threads: 76 vs 4
• Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.00 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 10 nm vs 14 nm FinFET
• 7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 19x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 14.3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2643 vs 2065
• 8.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 59069 vs 6795

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 19% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 80°C
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 270 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon W-3375
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2643 2065
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	59069 6795

Compare specifications (specs)