Intel Xeon W3565 vs Intel Xeon 3.20

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W3565 and Intel Xeon 3.20 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3565

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
• Around 8% higher clock speed: 3.46 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
• 32x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1504 vs 756
• 7.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3366 vs 461

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 3.20

• Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 97 Watt vs 130 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon W3565
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 3.20

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1504 756
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3366 461

Compare specifications (specs)