Intel Xeon W3565 vs Intel Xeon E5504
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W3565 and Intel Xeon E5504 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3565
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 73% higher clock speed: 3.46 GHz vs 2 GHz
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1505 vs 870
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3370 vs 3305
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.052 vs 0.383
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 52.603 vs 30.376
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.342 vs 0.144
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.732 vs 0.912
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.841 vs 2.862
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | November 2009 vs March 2009 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.46 GHz vs 2 GHz |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) vs 4096 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1505 vs 870 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3370 vs 3305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.052 vs 0.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 52.603 vs 30.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.342 vs 0.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.732 vs 0.912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.841 vs 2.862 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5504
- 6x more maximum memory size: 144 GB vs 24 GB
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1613 vs 522
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4704 vs 2070
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 144 GB vs 24 GB |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1613 vs 522 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4704 vs 2070 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon W3565
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5504
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon W3565 | Intel Xeon E5504 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1505 | 870 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3370 | 3305 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 522 | 1613 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2070 | 4704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.052 | 0.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 52.603 | 30.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.342 | 0.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.732 | 0.912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.841 | 2.862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon W3565 | Intel Xeon E5504 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bloomfield | Nehalem EP |
Launch date | November 2009 | March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $60 |
Place in performance rating | 2649 | 2598 |
Price now | $69.95 | $69.95 |
Processor Number | W3565 | E5504 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.02 | 11.38 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 4.8 GT/s QPI | 4.8 GT/s QPI |
Die size | 263 mm2 | 263 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.46 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of QPI Links | 1 | 2 |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
Transistor count | 731 million | 731 million |
VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.225V | 0.75V -1.35V |
Maximum core temperature | 76°C | |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Max memory channels | 3 | 3 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 19.2 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB | 144 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR3 800 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Package Size | 42.5mm x 45.0mm | 42.5mm x 45mm |
Sockets supported | FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1366 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | 40-bit |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |