Intel Xeon X3440 vs AMD Opteron 144
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon X3440 and AMD Opteron 144 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X3440
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 63% higher clock speed: 2.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
| Launch date | 8 September 2009 vs September 2003 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 130 nm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 144
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 82 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 82 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 144
| Name | Intel Xeon X3440 | AMD Opteron 144 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 54.918 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.33 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.597 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.562 | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 376 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon X3440 | AMD Opteron 144 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Lynnfield | SledgeHammer |
| Launch date | 8 September 2009 | September 2003 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $215 | $65 |
| Place in performance rating | 3146 | 3182 |
| Processor Number | X3440 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
| Price now | $65 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.20 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.53 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72.7 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Transistor count | 774 million | 106 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.65V - 1.4V | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066/1333 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | LGA1156 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 82 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 4x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||