AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 7407.4x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 128 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1113 vs 123
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 25 February 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1113 vs 123 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 594 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 269
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 594 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5038 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 408 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1113 | 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Dragon Range | RV620 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 25 February 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 803 | 802 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 594 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 47.52 gflops | |
Transistor count | 181 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 6.34 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 792 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |