AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1402 MHz
- 33461.5x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 11.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27793 vs 2438
- 29.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 30
- 55.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6998 vs 126
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 12 October 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1402 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 vs 2438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 30 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 vs 126 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 2438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 30 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 126 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Phoenix | GT218 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 1674 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1402 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 8.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 500 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |