AMD PlayStation 4 GPU vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of AMD PlayStation 4 GPU and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD PlayStation 4 GPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,843 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Launch date | 24 November 2013 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,843 gflops vs 716.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD PlayStation 4 GPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
Name | AMD PlayStation 4 GPU | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD PlayStation 4 GPU | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Liverpool | Oland |
Launch date | 24 November 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1087 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Price now | $78.34 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,843 gflops | 716.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1* | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 176.0 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |