AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Comparative analysis of AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 4,198 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 4,198 gflops vs 2,460 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 911 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 911 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Name | AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3629 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17716 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Playstation 4 Pro GPU | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Neo | Baffin |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 10 November 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 611 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 911 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,198 gflops | 2,460 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel / s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,000 million |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | N / A | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |